Articles sent to the journal are evaluated in the following way

1 – Double-blind peer review

A first reading is done by two evaluators separately. A feedback is gathered, including 3 possible outcomes: 1) Acceptance without modifications 2) request for modifications 3) refusal.

2 – Reports sent to the author with advice from the Editorial board

Based on the reviewer's conclusion, the Editorial board informs the author of its decision (reached outcome) and, if necessary, makes a request for modifications. The new article must be submitted within 2 months.

3 – Review of the new article

If modifications were requested, the new article is returned to the reviewers, who decide on the publication.